03:32:21 | contrapumpkin: | contrapumpkin is now known as copumpkin |
03:57:39 | samesong_: | samesong_ is now known as samesong|awy |
03:57:41 | samesong|awy: | samesong|awy is now known as samesong_ |
04:09:16 | maaku: | gmaxwell: so it occured to me that the OWAS scheme prevents covenants |
04:09:22 | maaku: | not sure if that is a plus or a minus |
04:15:23 | waxwing__: | waxwing__ is now known as waxwing |
05:28:01 | maaku: | gmaxwell: no, nevermind -- you could still have certain forms of covenants, clearly |
05:28:14 | maaku: | just the ones that remain stable/valid as you add & reorder inputs and outputs |
05:35:58 | zenojis: | zenojis is now known as xenogis |
06:50:10 | wallet421: | wallet421 is now known as wallet42 |
07:10:48 | Pasha: | Pasha is now known as Cory |
14:03:05 | zooko``: | zooko`` is now known as zooko |
14:12:56 | zooko: | zooko has left #bitcoin-wizards |
15:15:46 | nell: | WOAH bitcoin over dial tones! |
15:15:48 | nell: | brilliant! |
16:17:15 | jgarzik: | jgarzik is now known as home_jg |
17:54:45 | Dizzle: | Dizzle is now known as Guest54496 |
17:55:13 | Guest54496: | Guest54496 is now known as Dizzle |
18:14:40 | jgarzik: | jgarzik is now known as | |
18:14:44 | |: | | is now known as ||| |
18:14:48 | |||: | ||| is now known as jg_quote |
18:14:57 | jg_quote: | jg_quote is now known as jgarzik |
19:53:48 | Dizzle: | Dizzle is now known as Guest10305 |
19:55:47 | Guest10305: | Guest10305 is now known as Dizzle |
19:59:04 | nsh: | nsh is now known as nsh_m |
19:59:27 | nsh_m: | nsh_m is now known as nsh |
20:32:14 | home_jg: | home_jg is now known as jgarzik |
21:45:38 | Eliel_: | gmaxwell: I got the idea from that text just fine. |
21:45:49 | Eliel_: | (the ring signature text) |
21:47:28 | Eliel_: | I needed to scratch my head for a while before I understood why the receiver of a transfer can only spend one from all the outputs. |
21:48:22 | Eliel_: | It's pretty simple, but would probably help if it was spelled out directly. |
22:28:53 | andytoshi: | Eliel_: is "that text" https://download.wpsoftware.net/bitcoin/wizardry/brs-arbitrary-output-sizes.txt ? |
22:29:10 | Eliel_: | andytoshi: yes that |
22:29:11 | andytoshi: | i'll add some clarification on that point, i agree it's nonobvious |
22:29:20 | luke-jr_: | luke-jr_ is now known as Luke-Jr |
22:33:40 | andytoshi: | Eliel_: ok, i've replaced the " |
22:33:43 | andytoshi: | Double-spending is prevented..." paragraph |
22:36:27 | tacotime: | Is there somewhere the COERCE algorithm is described in detail? |
22:37:31 | andytoshi: | tacotime: a simple example would be "use the number as the x-coordinate for the EC point, and take the upper y-coordinate" |
22:37:41 | andytoshi: | i should probably put that in as an example.. |
22:38:31 | tacotime: | Oh, okay |
22:42:47 | Eliel_: | andytoshi: umm, what I was after was a simple answer to the question "why can't the receiver of output spend the ghost outputs too?". |
22:47:02 | andytoshi: | Eliel_: oh, ok. i've gotta run, i'll fix that in an hour or two....i'll think about what a simple answer might look like in the meantime :) |
23:49:44 | paavo: | Anyone know how to restore android wallet keys on an iphone? |
23:49:50 | paavo: | Is that possible? |
23:50:15 | melvster: | melvster is now known as melvster_other |
23:50:51 | melvster_other: | melvster_other is now known as melvster |