00:22:26penny:penny is now known as Guest51266
01:03:22wallet42:wallet42 is now known as Guest26342
01:03:22wallet421:wallet421 is now known as wallet42
02:36:35samson2:samson2 is now known as samson_
02:45:58fanquake:fanquake has left #bitcoin-wizards
04:12:37zz_lnovy:zz_lnovy is now known as lnovy
04:13:05CryptOprah_:CryptOprah_ is now known as CryptOprah
04:13:56jbenet_:jbenet_ is now known as jbenet
04:15:46penny:penny is now known as Guest42465
04:15:54btc__:btc__ is now known as btc_
07:56:14lclc_bnc:lclc_bnc is now known as lclc
09:05:15sinisalo.freenode.net:topic is: This channel is not about short-term Bitcoin development | http://bitcoin.ninja/ | This channel is logged. | For logs and more information, visit http://bitcoin.ninja
09:05:15sinisalo.freenode.net:Users on #bitcoin-wizards: andy-logbot coinheavy OX3_ MoALTz cbeams orik lclc Greed profreid Logicwax jaekwon_ Starduster Grishnakh c0rw1n webdeli_ fanquake TheSeven justanotheruser GnarSith ryanxcharles sneak Guest42465 throughnothing [d__d] null_rad- livegnik_ gnusha_ espes___ petertod1 warptangent_ sipa_ hguux_ lnovy AdrianG_ CryptOprah btc_ jbenet michagogo ahmed_ NewLiberty_ optimator shesek Dr-G2 samson_ Fistful_of_Coins woah devrandom Emcy_ BigBitz nuke1989
09:05:15sinisalo.freenode.net:Users on #bitcoin-wizards: maaku_ grandmaster2 Flyer9933 spinza_ irclouis moa Baz___ kristofferR waxwing OneFixt_ luny DoctorBTC Meeh Aquent bosma atgreen Guest78642 GAit PRab nickler SubCreative otoburb mortale dgenr8 btcdrak zenojis wumpus kyletorpey artifexd PaulCapestany EasyAt BlueMatt kumavis _2539 HaltingState citizen11 tacotime zwischenzug starsoccer pi07r phawk Hunger- HM Adlai ebfull kefkius BananaLotus wizkid057 prepost hollandais go1111111 super3 Cory
09:05:15sinisalo.freenode.net:Users on #bitcoin-wizards: Nightwolf comboy epscy paperbot rasengan altoz fluffypony K1773R fenn kanzure heath stonecoldpat copumpkin LarsLarsen jaromil weex helo tromp_ Keefe Iriez Eliel jrayhawk crescendo Luke-Jr coutts CodeShark iddo gmaxwell [\\\] bobke_ napedia huseby Anduck phedny iambernie MRL-Relay berndj phantomcircuit mmozeiko midnightmagic sl01 nsh Muis arowser poggy NikolaiToryzin cfields coryfields mappum Taek andytoshi BrainOverfl0w fds4345 gazab
09:05:15sinisalo.freenode.net:Users on #bitcoin-wizards: Apocalyptic warren gavinandresen dansmith_btc mr_burdell zibbo_ tromp SomeoneWeird kgk firepacket Dyaheon myeagleflies @ChanServ lechuga_ abc56889 harrow so Gnosis pajarillo roasbeef ryan-c [Tristan] TD-Linux catcow danneu amiller yoleaux @gwillen smooth Graet LaptopZZ a5m0 kinlo Krellan gribble asoltys nanotube pigeons
16:50:13Taek:This winter we will probably spend several hundred dollars heating out home
16:50:56Taek:If Bitcoin miners became efficient enough, people might be able to replace their heating systems with mining rigs
16:51:13Taek:all the heat that's normally an issue for data centers would be a virtue in a decentralized context
16:51:25Taek:but only in the winter
16:58:38bitjedi:hi
16:59:11maaku_:maaku_ is now known as maaku
17:00:03tacotime:* tacotime codes by the heat of ASICs in the winter.
17:07:46andytoshi:link to etay/sirer 2ppow? i thought their proposal was trivially non-progress-free, i don't recall it being interesting or tunable so i guess i am thinking of something else?
17:08:57andytoshi:in fact, i thought asic-faq.pdf was a perfectly good rebuttal despite having been written several months earlier :P
17:09:19tromp:http://hackingdistributed.com/2014/06/18/how-to-disincentivize-large-bitcoin-mining-pools/
17:11:21andytoshi:yeah, that's right... it's trivially not progress-free because there are two stages which both require work
17:11:53andytoshi:which i read as "they have not done even basic research into how pow works" and stopped reading there, phd or no this is layman crypto
17:17:59tromp:it's mostly progress free. way more than cuckoo cycle anyway
17:18:40tromp:after solving the 1st stage, you only do 1 signature+hash in the 2nd stage
17:20:21tromp:how would that give fast miners a disproportionate advantage?
17:59:06andytoshi:the 2nd stage involves many hashes because you are trying to get hash(sig) to be small
17:59:57andytoshi:oh, i see, if you use a unique sig scheme then it's ok
18:02:49andytoshi:i read it as deliberately using a randomized sig scheme to do a second pow
18:03:15tromp:no; it's meant to be a single deterministic check
18:04:09andytoshi:ok, my bad, i read and dismissed the scheme too quickly
18:15:15gmaxwell:Weird that they've still not updated their page to point out whats required to make the second a single check.
18:16:45nuke_:nuke_ is now known as nuke1989
18:31:14maaku:maaku is now known as Guest78375
18:33:20kefkius_:kefkius_ is now known as kefkius
19:01:12Guest78375:Guest78375 is now known as maaku
20:56:33jps:jps is now known as nybex
22:10:43phantomcircuit:will a transaction which has only 1 output value 0 with op_return be considered standard?
22:13:02gmaxwell:Yep.
22:14:15phantomcircuit:the limit is 40 bytes right?
22:14:56gmaxwell:Yep.
22:15:17gmaxwell:if you're just making a commitment, you might want to consider using the contract hash tool instead.
22:17:32phantomcircuit:gmaxwell, hmm interesting
23:19:26phantomcircuit:are transaction id's reversed in rpc calls?
23:29:24tacotime:um, depends on your implementation, but i noticed with bitcoind sometimes they were as compared to the raw tx.
23:31:17tacotime:does that have to do with the byte ordering when you push it off stack for a txin? never thought about it, but this is more #bitcoin-dev
23:31:55tacotime:ehm, that's not a script either, nevermind, it's just from a struct.