01:39:27 | c0rw1n: | c0rw1n is now known as c0rw|sleep |
02:41:27 | orik: | orik is now known as orik|away |
06:48:22 | moa: | http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2015/03/who-on-earth-would-attack-github-for-its-anti-great-firewall-projects/ something worth pondering re bitcoinn |
07:24:57 | orik|away: | orik|away is now known as orik |
08:05:15 | kornbluth.freenode.net: | topic is: This channel is not about short-term Bitcoin development | http://bitcoin.ninja/ | This channel is logged. | For logs and more information, visit http://bitcoin.ninja |
08:05:15 | kornbluth.freenode.net: | Users on #bitcoin-wizards: andy-logbot dgenr8 luigiafk koshii b_lumenkraft Starduster justanotheruser JonTitor p15_ TheSeven p15x TRSullivan d1ggy_ RoboTeddy szumen yorick devrandom Emcy coiner Cory kyuupichan Logicwax moa d9b4bef9 spinza tromp face runeks phantomcircuit EasyAt dc17523be3 orik hashtag_ hashtagg_ gielbier c0rw|sleep iugfhvybu Dr-G cgt_ MoALTz thrasher` OneFixt waxwing helo wiz lechuga_ a5m0_ catlasshrugged_ jaekwon luigi11111 isis PaulCapestany |
08:05:15 | kornbluth.freenode.net: | Users on #bitcoin-wizards: DougieBot5000 bosma nanotube Tiraspol cluckj Pan0ram1x yoleaux LeMiner alferz PRab Burrito gmaxwell andytoshi berndj grandmaster gavinandresen adam3us dignork shesek AdrianG antgreen aakselrod maraoz_ s1w livegnik optimator fluffypony Meeh cursive dansmith_btc morcos guruvan BananaLotus maaku bedeho heath roasbeef_ eordano_ amiller_ Fistful_of_Coins dardasaba jonasschnelli comboy_ tromp_ HM crescendo jgarzik_ SubCreative stonecoldpat nuke_ |
08:05:15 | kornbluth.freenode.net: | Users on #bitcoin-wizards: DoctorBTC afdudley binaryatrocity GAit ahmed_ betarigs_admin amincd espes__ pigeons otoburb eric jessepollak sneak airbreather Adlai sipa warptangent lmacken gribble ryan-c mkarrer_ melvster phedny so nuke1989 rustyn adams_ Transisto bliljerk101 Luke-Jr STRML nsh harrow` huseby GreenIsMyPepper forrestv luny Xzibit17 hguux__ michagogo yrashk mariorz deepcore ajweiss pollux-bts null sl01 kefkius SwedFTP larraboj midnightmagic lnovy Iriez |
08:05:15 | kornbluth.freenode.net: | Users on #bitcoin-wizards: Apocalyptic jcorgan [d__d] NikolaiToryzin petertodd kanzure catcow Muis cfields Zouppen coryfields_ cryptowest_ kinlo wizkid057 wumpus BlueMatt jaromil @gwillen dasource fenn nickler Alanius sdaftuar Hunger- null_radix epscy starsoccer Taek smooth artifexd kumavis Krellan platinuum Oizopower Keefe mappum jbenet gnusha warren Graet Eliel veox indolering K1773R TD-Linux leakypat CryptOprah Anduck mr_burdell NeatBasis davout brand0 @ChanServ |
08:05:15 | kornbluth.freenode.net: | Users on #bitcoin-wizards: throughnothing btc___ azariah MRL-Relay BrainOverfl0w |
12:38:47 | c0rw|sleep: | c0rw|sleep is now known as c0rw1n |
13:26:19 | wiz_: | wiz_ is now known as wiz |
13:29:50 | wiz: | wiz is now known as jmaurice |
15:04:12 | c0rw1n: | c0rw1n is now known as c0rw|away |
16:43:07 | andytoshi: | this made me laugh https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1005487.msg10913091#msg10913091 "looks random to me, unless i'm missing something" |
16:46:30 | fluffypony: | lol |
16:46:58 | Chillum: | < 128 bit key = fail |
16:47:10 | fluffypony: | missing something like...I dunno...an understanding of randomness |
16:49:55 | fluffypony: | speaking of gems |
16:50:02 | fluffypony: | https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1001642.msg10921551#msg10921551 |
16:50:08 | fluffypony: | "Cryptography has never been a significant part of cryptocurrency - even though it may share the first few letters. It works on a system of digital signatures." |
17:21:06 | andytoshi: | classic :D |
18:19:50 | gmaxwell: | ... |
18:20:16 | fluffypony: | gmaxwell: it gets much worse, he doubles down on it |
18:20:21 | STRML: | what |
18:25:00 | wallet42: | wallet42 is now known as Guest54356 |
18:25:00 | wallet421: | wallet421 is now known as wallet42 |
18:31:16 | andytoshi: | in fairness, his doubling-down is citing vitalik saying almost the same words with "encryption" in place of "cryptography" when mocking a press article misusing words |
18:45:53 | fluffypony: | yeah I saw that - he's misunderstanding what Vitalik was saying |
18:46:56 | gmaxwell: | fluffypony: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1001642.msg10922949#msg10922949 |
18:48:46 | fluffypony: | classic |
18:48:51 | gmaxwell: | fluffypony: I didn't have the impression that vitalik had any great recognition of the scope and implications of these systems being cryptographic either. (E.g. just the long list of sloppy adhoc systems that turn out to be insecure once subject to critical inspection). |
18:52:31 | STRML: | how could you possible use bitcoin and not have any idea of the cryptography underpinning it |
18:52:58 | Chillum: | push gas, car go fast |
18:56:11 | adam3us: | Chillum: btw i saw the Luke-Jr Chillum exchange on #bitcoin-dev. Luke-Jr is correct, his point is that you really, actually can NOT assume there is a from address. think about sending from coinbase, or bitstamp, or coinJoin transaction, or a mixer. if you refund or assume that address private key is in the control of the person sending you money, bad you will lose. |
18:57:05 | Chillum: | I agree with that. But that only means a source does not equal a return address. It does not mean there is no source address |
18:57:51 | Chillum: | at the level that humans use bitcoin there is such a concept, even if there is no such concept at the core of the protocol |
18:58:08 | adam3us: | Chillum: well there are inputs for sure, but dont get in the habit of thinking a specific human is the sender, due to shared sending situations of which there are many. |
18:58:31 | adam3us: | Chillum: yes but thats wrong, that has resulted in lost money, confusion; that concept needs to die |
18:58:43 | Chillum: | I never meant to imply that addresses represented a real world identity in any fashion. They are of course disconnected |
18:58:56 | Chillum: | I have to go now |
18:59:05 | adam3us: | Chillum: ok then |
19:43:49 | lmatteis: | hello. maybe it's the wrong place to ask. but am looking for research regarding having the Web infrastructure (WWW, HTTP, etc) using a p2p model rather than a client-server model |
19:47:49 | sipa: | maybe it's the wrong place to ask. but am looking for research regarding having the transportation infrastructure (cars, trains, etc) using a air model rather than a road model |
19:47:55 | sipa: | :p |
19:48:06 | lmatteis: | lol |
19:49:03 | lmatteis: | this is the only thing i found from the Bittorent people |
19:49:03 | lmatteis: | http://blog.bittorrent.com/2014/12/10/project-maelstrom-the-internet-we-build-next/ |
19:49:19 | lmatteis: | but i'm not sure why they're not open-sourcing any of it |
19:49:39 | lmatteis: | how do they even make mone |
19:49:41 | lmatteis: | money |
19:56:36 | nubbins`: | how indeed would they make money without open-sourcing it? :s |
19:57:11 | jgarzik_: | jgarzik_ is now known as jgarzik |
20:18:02 | amiller_: | lmatteis, ask melvster (in pm or maybe #webpayments), he knows about web things, basically off topic here though |
20:28:33 | melvster: | lmatteis try w3c payments group, or ask me if you have something more specific, perhaps better to continue this conversation on #webpayments or #swig |
20:31:38 | arubi_: | arubi_ is now known as arubi |
22:26:22 | sadoshi38: | sadoshi38 has left #bitcoin-wizards |
22:26:47 | sadoshi87: | sadoshi87 has left #bitcoin-wizards |
22:30:14 | Sadoshi: | Sadoshi is now known as sadoshi |
23:45:07 | c0rw|away: | c0rw|away is now known as c0rw1n |