| 00:23:49 | andytoshi: | gmaxwell: sorry, i haven't had a chance to look at this, i've been sick all weekend and have a backlog of schoolwork because of it :/ but on a high level i'm excited, this problem seems really hard to me and it's good to make some progress |
| 07:14:30 | fluffypony: | andytoshi: I have the backlog problem, so I've found the simple solution is just to clone yourself. Unfortunately that technology doesn't seem to be ready yet, so I'm settling for 16-hour work days;) |
| 08:05:18 | kornbluth.freenode.net: | topic is: This channel is not about short-term Bitcoin development | http://bitcoin.ninja/ | This channel is logged. | For logs and more information, visit http://bitcoin.ninja |
| 08:05:18 | kornbluth.freenode.net: | Users on #bitcoin-wizards: andy-logbot Mably go1111111 adam3us1 p15 p15x SDCDev cbeams hktud0 priidu wallet42 NewLiberty b_lumenkraft arubi xcthulhu helo unlord_ [7] Tiraspol moa jeremyrubin Dr-G nickler x98gvyn Guest55444 Emcy jhogan42 hashtag_ CodeShark prodatalab trstovall sparetire RoboTeddy dansmith_btc antgreen` dgenr8 sadoshi Starduster_ GAit melvster coinrookie mkarrer PaulCapestany Kwelstr nessence [d__d] hulkhogan42o dignork pollux-bts nuke1989 dc17523be3 |
| 08:05:18 | kornbluth.freenode.net: | Users on #bitcoin-wizards: binaryatrocity kanzure cluckj gnusha OneFixt_ luny bedeho BananaLotus guruvan lmacken rustyn harrigan Pan0ram1x waxwing spinza Eliel Cory K1773R kgk LeMiner warren c0rw|away grandmaster xapp Alanius brand0 poggy ajweiss Zouppen Krellan stonecoldpat phedny aakselrod HM s1w lechuga__ EasyAt_ yorick afdudley mm_0 Taek lnovy cdecker wiz leakypat platinuum koshii MoALTz isis smooth sneak SubCreative Madars tromp_ throughnothing_ amiller |
| 08:05:18 | kornbluth.freenode.net: | Users on #bitcoin-wizards: sparetire_ gmaxwell maaku Xzibit17 adams_ forrestv richardus adlai Fistful_of_coins morcos sdaftuar andytoshi Iriez copumpkin face nsh cfields_ wumpus mappum jbenet NeatBasisW dasource dardasaba ebfull luigi1111w jonasschnelli merlincorey [ace] eric a5m0 nephyrin null_radix crescendo Sqt mikolalysenko sturles GreenIsMyPepper harrow vonzipper berndj manan19 comboy jaromil catlasshrugged_ Apocalyptic cryptowest_ runeks__ Graet veox indolering |
| 08:05:18 | kornbluth.freenode.net: | Users on #bitcoin-wizards: Keefe petertodd jcorgan larraboj ryan-c jessepollak gribble tromp mr_burdell d9b4bef9 starsoccer weex SwedFTP Hunger- Luke-Jr yrashk artifexd kumavis otoburb huseby midnightmagic BlueMatt TD-Linux mariorz hguux___ wizkid057 Anduck kyuupichan Logicwax phantomcircuit luigi1111 nanotube yoleaux gavinandresen AdrianG livegnik optimator fluffypony Meeh cursive roasbeef_ espes__ pigeons warptangent STRML michagogo sl01 catcow Muis coryfields_ |
| 08:05:18 | kornbluth.freenode.net: | Users on #bitcoin-wizards: kinlo gwillen epscy Oizopower CryptOprah davout @ChanServ azariah MRL-Relay BrainOverfl0w |
| 09:21:34 | maaku: | maaku is now known as Guest50139 |
| 10:50:33 | Eliel: | Is someone working on ways to make use of public open source projects with git repositories as a proof of work timestamping system? |
| 11:01:49 | wumpus: | Eliel: I doubt it, do any open source projects consent to be used for that? Also verifying proof-of-programming-work is famously difficult :-) |
| 11:03:12 | Eliel: | wumpus: I don't think verifying proof of programming would be necessary to do algorithmically in this case. |
| 11:07:23 | wumpus: | and even if you could quanity the amount of work that goes into it, it wouldn't qualify as PoW scheme, it's trivial to change git history because it's so easy to re-apply previous work |
| 11:07:59 | Eliel: | wumpus: yes, as long as you're speaking of a single repository that hasn't been shared. |
| 11:08:35 | wumpus: | so, how would you judge what chain is the right one, if there are multiple divergent ones? |
| 11:10:54 | Eliel: | wumpus: the idea is to have lots of separate but interlocking chains that sometimes fork and sometimes merge. Analysis would not be a simple task. |
| 11:11:17 | Eliel: | so, I doubt this would work for a cryptocurrency. |
| 11:12:16 | Eliel: | at least not as the short term consensus mechanism. Would probably work for cementing for the long term though. |
| 11:18:10 | wumpus: | you could use signed git commits to avoid rewriting without consent of all the contributors, that would make it more similar to proof of stake than proof of work |
| 11:19:56 | Eliel: | also, there's no reason to limit this to a single project. if you can cross link between most projects in existence, I suspect it'd become very difficult to manipulate in any way |
| 12:48:03 | adlai: | Two-Way Pegging Through Federated Submodules? |
| 12:48:23 | fluffypony: | git-peg |
| 13:42:06 | b_lumenkraft: | b_lumenkraft has left #bitcoin-wizards |
| 15:59:56 | Dr-G2: | Dr-G2 is now known as Dr-G420 |
| 16:27:43 | Starduster_: | Starduster_ is now known as Starduster |
| 19:40:35 | antanst: | antanst has left #bitcoin-wizards |
| 21:14:32 | zooko`: | zooko` is now known as zooko |