00:23:42 | Sub|afk: | Sub|afk is now known as SubCreative |
01:12:39 | Taek: | Taek is now known as Taek42 |
01:57:22 | c0rw1n: | c0rw1n is now known as c0rw|zZz |
02:14:37 | Taek42: | Taek42 is now known as Taek |
07:52:20 | rustyn_: | rustyn_ is now known as rustyn |
08:05:15 | hitchcock.freenode.net: | topic is: This channel is not about short-term Bitcoin development | http://bitcoin.ninja/ | This channel is logged. | For logs and more information, visit http://bitcoin.ninja |
08:05:15 | hitchcock.freenode.net: | Users on #bitcoin-wizards: andy-logbot dEBRUYNE luny fanquake Sub|afk KuDeTa chmod755 arubi_ gill3s priidu airbreather_1 rusty dc17523be3 rustyn Mably antanst wallet42 sadoshi p15 [7] lmacken justanotheruser prodatalab Dr-G adam3us jae_ helo jgarzik d1ggy_ Pan0ram1x moa spinza tcrypt DrWat bosma sparetire_ dgenr8 c0rw|zZz HM ur5edgb Tiraspol Cory adlai MoALTz LeMiner ebfull larraboj williamdunne berndj CodeShark brand0 nickler cluckj jmcn metamarc PRab yrashk |
08:05:15 | hitchcock.freenode.net: | Users on #bitcoin-wizards: vonzipper cfields jonasschnelli nsh GreenIsMyPepper Krellan_ Luke-Jr stevenroose Taek coryfields amiller- Meeh deego mkarrer_ Emcy catlasshrugged cryptowest_ Alanius null_radix kanzure gavinand1esen amincd OneFixt Logicwax copumpkin dansmith_ antgreen stonecoldpat bliljerk_ gielbier melvster bedeho2 waxwing azariah harrow tromp_ ttttemp s23ioj234i isis aakselrod scoria andytoshi warptangent harrigan Madars PaulCapestany sparetire davout |
08:05:15 | hitchcock.freenode.net: | Users on #bitcoin-wizards: comboy TD-Linux yorick crescend1 dardasaba___ veox mm_1 theymos Zouppen huseby sipa cdecker hulkhogan_ _whitelogger wumpus binaryatrocity heath BananaLotus ir2ivps5 wiz maaku face_ michagogo Apocalyptic kyuupichan [d__d] NeatBasis optimator Eliel gnusha tromp narwh4l lmatteis wizkid057 koshii leakypat mr_burdell throughnothing_ mengine sneak elastoma btcdrak fluffypony Fistful_of_Coins yoleaux Jaamg se3000 xabbix iddo mariorz catcow a5m0_ |
08:05:15 | hitchcock.freenode.net: | Users on #bitcoin-wizards: smooth dignork runeks CryptoGoon Sqt poggy jbenet platinuum adams__ livegnik K1773R petertodd richardus nephyrin phedny so phantomcircuit afdudley pigeons SwedFTP guruvan lnovy ajweiss nanotube forrestv artifexd mappum mikolalysenko Muis warren weex_ Xzibit17 sdaftuar eric roasbeef s1w CryptOprah morcos EasyAt Iriez merlincorey [ace] sturles jaromil Graet indolering Keefe ryan-c jessepollak gribble d9b4bef9 starsoccer kumavis otoburb |
08:05:15 | hitchcock.freenode.net: | Users on #bitcoin-wizards: midnightmagic BlueMatt Anduck luigi1111 AdrianG espes__ STRML sl01 kinlo gwillen Oizopower BrainOverfl0w @ChanServ |
08:28:28 | dansmith_: | dansmith_ has left #bitcoin-wizards |
08:39:32 | jmcn: | .list |
08:52:20 | vfor: | vfor has left #bitcoin-wizards |
08:58:40 | nsh: | -- |
08:58:40 | nsh: | fod, thanks. however that doesn't seem to go beyond what's already shown at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montgomery_curve#Equivalence_with_twisted_Edwards_curves . I'm looking for a way to directly convert projective Twisted Edwards to/from to projective Montgomery, ideally without field inversions. My plan is to convert to montgomery, do scalar multiplication with its arithmetic and convert back to twisted edwards in the end. |
08:58:41 | nsh: | nsh, is there a more appropriate for ECC related questions? |
08:58:52 | nsh: | [..] |
08:58:53 | nsh: | but djb, et al. use affine coordinates there, which is probably okay if you're interested in showing the birational equivalence...however in practice for performance reason most use projective coordinates, also shown in the paper for twisted Edards, and X/Z coordinates for Montgomery curves |
08:58:54 | nsh: | -- |
09:00:02 | nsh: | all seems relatively well-discussed here: http://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/14957/how-do-i-convert-the-definition-of-e-521-into-a-curve-definition-a-la-bouncy-cas |
09:00:16 | nsh: | assuming you read moonmath at an elementary level |
10:52:22 | c0rw|zZz: | c0rw|zZz is now known as c0rw1n |
10:55:03 | SDCDev: | SDCDev is now known as nohighlightSDCDe |
11:19:08 | airbreather_1: | airbreather_1 is now known as airbreather |
13:08:20 | CoinMuncher: | Possibly interesting paper for libsecp256k1 and/or Trezor developers? http://www.cosic.esat.kuleuven.be/publications/article-2475.pdf "The main advantages of the threshold implementation approach are that it provides provable security against first-order DPA attacks with minimal assumptions on the hardware technology, in particular, it is also secure in the presence of glitches, ..." Cum Laude at Dutch Twente University and Belgium Leuven U |
13:17:23 | wallet421: | wallet421 is now known as wallet42 |
14:14:16 | nohighlightSDCDe: | nohighlightSDCDe is now known as Rynomster |
16:41:23 | sipa: | sipa has left #bitcoin-wizards |
17:17:13 | wallet42: | wallet42 is now known as Guest72974 |
17:17:13 | wallet421: | wallet421 is now known as wallet42 |
17:25:56 | antanst: | antanst has left #bitcoin-wizards |
18:03:26 | antanst: | antanst has left #bitcoin-wizards |
19:02:48 | GreenIsMyPepper: | GreenIsMyPepper has left #bitcoin-wizards |
19:24:29 | aakselrod: | d |
19:24:37 | aakselrod: | sorry :) accident. |
20:25:20 | Sub|afk: | Sub|afk is now known as SubCreative |
20:39:21 | Guest11561: | Guest11561 is now known as amiller |
20:39:36 | KuDeTa: | what do the wizards make of 21inc? |
20:41:31 | deego: | deego has left #bitcoin-wizards |
20:51:32 | Taek: | I can't speak for anyone else but I've found it difficult to understand what they are doing and why it's worth so much money |
20:51:40 | Taek: | without knowing more, it's difficult to pass judgement |
20:54:38 | hulkhogan_: | it almost sounds like they've created a cutting edge asic, and are using mobile as the distribution mechanism. |
20:54:47 | hulkhogan_: | its too hard to say without details |
20:56:04 | Taek: | mobile is a really weird choice. Your average phone battery has a hard enough time as is |
20:56:32 | Taek: | unless their power efficiency is an order of magnitude better than anything else out there, I don't see how mining from a phone could be profitable |
20:57:01 | hulkhogan_: | yea, thats my guess- otherwise it doesnt make sense at all (also the amount of money they raised, so they must be on to something (?)) |
20:57:14 | KuDeTa: | perhaps its more about the wallet technology, and the mining is over-egged. A hardware wallet in every device on the planet.. |
20:57:56 | Taek: | That makes more sense. Especially if they've reduced the power requirements of running a pruned node. |
20:58:54 | hulkhogan_: | they sorta stated wanting to use the tech as a revenue model for 'pay-as-you-go' services, so you mine in the bknd and pay as you consume content (or whatever) to the distributor |
20:59:35 | Taek: | maybe they meant by using payment channels? Again I don't see how a phone battery could mine enough bitcoins to 'pay as you go' |
21:00:15 | hulkhogan_: | me neither, but if you read the medium announcement, they allude to that a couple times iirc |
21:02:13 | temujin: | mining while your phone is charging most likely |
21:02:35 | hulkhogan_: | ie "one can imagine the ultimate thin client [...] using the bitcoin generated therein to purchase computation in the cloud." |
21:02:36 | temujin: | overnight and after work, can be 8-14 hours depending on your lifestyle patterns |
21:03:04 | Taek: | I'd definietly be more interested in an asic that heats my home or water tank |
21:03:33 | nsh: | * nsh blinks |
21:03:39 | nsh: | capitalism is stupid |
21:03:48 | hulkhogan_: | lol |
21:03:56 | Taek: | what specifically? |
21:03:58 | frankenmint: | nsh: name a superior system |
21:04:08 | frankenmint: | i implore you to |
21:04:40 | nsh: | so a bunch of people with smartphones are going to perform a bunch of calculations that are essentially useless so they can buy imaginary items while presumably accidentally also paying for said items with their linked payment card |
21:04:57 | frankenmint: | nsh: you must be talking about 21inc |
21:05:04 | nsh: | or else somebody else has an incredibly optimistic business model |
21:05:10 | nsh: | * nsh nods |
21:05:18 | frankenmint: | * frankenmint agrees that is a doomed model |
21:05:27 | nsh: | i mean, capitalism is stupid in general, but this is a particularly perplexing example |
21:05:33 | nsh: | .ety perplex |
21:05:34 | yoleaux: | perplex (v.): "late 14c. as an adjective, "perplexed, puzzled, bewildered," from Latin perplexus "involved, confused, intricate;" but Latin had no corresponding verb *perplectere. The Latin compound would be per "through" (see per) + plexus "entangled," …" — http://etymonline.com/index.php?term=perplex |
21:06:07 | frankenmint: | I think the other models allow for gains to be taken from earners |
21:06:19 | frankenmint: | which is why all other systems have gradually migrated to captialism |
21:07:10 | nsh: | (almost certainly outwith channel scope) |
21:07:16 | frankenmint: | the next system volunteerism is still too young and experimental, but I can see it increasing if proven models can indeed transition its users towards a 'utiopia' state |
21:07:42 | hulkhogan_: | gime morr cripto |
21:08:20 | frankenmint: | hulkhogan_: google DASC reddit, see my answer |
21:08:54 | frankenmint: | nvm not indexed yet |
21:09:25 | frankenmint: | http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/368k9d/how_to_prepare_for_possible_future_bitcoin_career/crc9j6z |
21:12:26 | hulkhogan_: | frankenmint: eh, i think nsh's comment was out of context, the weirdness of 21inc's plan is very left-field given what we know about mining economics |
21:13:08 | hulkhogan_: | (unrelated to capitalism etc, its partly or wholly nonsensical) |
21:13:27 | hulkhogan_: | s/nonsensical/nonsensical given what we know/ |
21:14:51 | frankenmint: | I just dropped by reddit today and now see its everywhere |
21:15:07 | frankenmint: | lol, so basically everyone knew from jump about it once they said quallcomm |
21:15:43 | frankenmint: | hulkhogan_: really sucks, If it wasn't 'a phone' I may give it a shot, but because its gonna be near my head and asic chips run hot ....forget that |
21:21:05 | hulkhogan_: | yea, lol |
21:22:22 | frankenmint: | I could turn this all around right now for them: Make the phones and service free If user agrees to keep them on X hours per month |
21:22:51 | frankenmint: | basically once the device 'roi's itself 2x over, then its elegible for an upgrade |
21:23:45 | Taek: | Assuming $30 per user |
21:23:57 | Taek: | that scales to ~800k users at todays prices |
21:24:07 | frankenmint: | yea right unless we're talking feature phones |
21:24:08 | Taek: | beyond that there aren't enough bitcoins that can be mined to pay for so many phone bills |
21:24:33 | frankenmint: | well, i guess, if they're free that wont matter??? |
21:25:12 | frankenmint: | lol oh God imagine how THIS would blow up: http://www.reddit.com/r/perktv |
21:25:33 | frankenmint: | 21 inc phone farms to mine passive + btc |
21:46:56 | nsh: | * nsh frowns |
22:00:01 | hulkhogan_: | they might have a bunch of partnering agreements already, which might also be the reason its more profitable for them to launch a consumer product vs just mine with new chips |
22:02:28 | nsh: | (this is definitely a #bitcoin navel-gazing unless it's somehow inexplicably possible to discuss the actual theoretical advances of this VC moneyhole) |
23:40:22 | kyletorpey: | kyletorpey has left #bitcoin-wizards |